Austin FC beat Portland Timbers 2–1. Bawler's model favoured Portland Timbers at 55% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Austin FC 22%. It forecast 3.1 goals and the match produced 3. Portland Timbers had 13 shots (5 on target) to Austin FC's 10 (3), with 50% of the ball against 50%. On expected goals it was 1.7 to 1.2, so Portland Timbers created the better chances and still lost the game.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
Chance of at least one first-half goal: 77%. Based on how often each side shoots and wins corners before the break, not a share of their full-match numbers.
Austin FC beat Portland Timbers 2–1. Bawler's model favoured Portland Timbers at 55% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Austin FC 22%. It forecast 3.1 goals and the match produced 3. Portland Timbers had 13 shots (5 on target) to Austin FC's 10 (3), with 50% of the ball against 50%. On expected goals it was 1.7 to 1.2, so Portland Timbers created the better chances and still lost the game.
Portland Timbers 1–2 Austin FC, played on 30 Aug 2026 in the USA: MLS. Bawler's model had gone into it with Portland Timbers 55%, the draw 23% and Austin FC 22%.
Full-time: Possession 50%–50%, Expected goals (xG) 1.7–1.2, Shots 13–10, Shots on target 5–3, Shots inside box 7–5, Big chances 3–2, Corners 6–3, Saves 1–4, Fouls 9–14, Offsides 3–1, Yellow cards 1–4.
Yes — both Portland Timbers and Austin FC scored, finishing 1–2. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 58% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Result — we said Portland Timbers 55%, it finished Austin FC (22% called); Total goals — we said 3.1, it finished 3; Both teams to score — we said 58%, it finished Yes; Model call — we said Over 1.5 Goals 81%, it finished Landed.