How it finished
Chicago Fire FC beat Orlando City SC 1–0. Bawler's model had Chicago Fire FC in front at 39% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 3.4 goals; only 1 was scored. Orlando City SC had 8 shots (3 on target) to Chicago Fire FC's 5 (2), with 55% of the ball against 45%. On expected goals it was 0.9 to 0.4, so Orlando City SC created the better chances and still lost the game.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
What we expected
Model inputs
Head to head
Common questions
Who won Orlando City SC vs Chicago Fire FC?
Chicago Fire FC beat Orlando City SC 1–0. Bawler's model had Chicago Fire FC in front at 39% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 3.4 goals; only 1 was scored. Orlando City SC had 8 shots (3 on target) to Chicago Fire FC's 5 (2), with 55% of the ball against 45%. On expected goals it was 0.9 to 0.4, so Orlando City SC created the better chances and still lost the game.
What was the final score in Orlando City SC vs Chicago Fire FC?
Orlando City SC 0–1 Chicago Fire FC, played on 20 Aug 2026 in the USA: MLS. Bawler's model had gone into it with Orlando City SC 37%, the draw 24% and Chicago Fire FC 39%.
What were the stats in Orlando City SC vs Chicago Fire FC?
Full-time: Possession 55%–45%, Expected goals (xG) 0.9–0.4, Shots 8–5, Shots on target 3–2, Shots inside box 5–3, Big chances 2–1, Corners 2–0, Saves 1–3, Fouls 5–4, Offsides 0–1.
Did both teams score in Orlando City SC vs Chicago Fire FC?
No. It finished 0–1, so Orlando City SC failed to score. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 66% before kickoff.
Was Bawler's prediction for Orlando City SC vs Chicago Fire FC right?
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Result — we said Chicago Fire FC 39%, it finished Chicago Fire FC (39% called); Total goals — we said 3.4, it finished 1; Both teams to score — we said 66%, it finished No; Model call — we said Over 1.5 Goals 85%, it finished Missed.