Match prediction·USA: MLS·Thursday 23 Jul, 01:30 UTC

Colorado Rapids vs San Diego FC

Bawler weighs each team's recent scoring and defending, then adjusts for home advantage and injuries to work out how this match is likely to go. This page shows the full chain — every number we used.

Why the model calls it this way

Over 1.5 Goals sits at 84% because Colorado's 1.98 expected goals vastly outpaces San Diego's 1.29, signalling a comfortable attacking edge at home.

📊 Win probability
50.6% home26.7% draw22.7% away
📈 xG chain — base → adjustments → final goal estimate
Colorado RapidsstepSan Diego FC
1.75Base xG · rolling 26-match1.37
× 1.13Home advantage · Home× 0.94
no injury adjustment — full squads available per FotMob
1.98Final goal estimate — what the model uses1.29

Colorado Rapids average 6.1 corners per game at home this season (21 competitive matches). San Diego average 4.0 corners per game away from home this season (22 competitive matches).

🎯 Scoreline distribution · chance of each scoremodel estimate
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
4
5
3
1
1
8
10
6
3
1
2
7
10
6
3
1
3
5
6
4
2
1
4
2
3
2
1
5
1
1
1
6
home windrawaway win
Most likely outcomes
Over 1.5 goals
84%
Over 3.5 goals
29%

Model probabilities for this fixture, ordered by likelihood. Estimates from rolling expected goals — not guarantees.

More predictions for these teams

Colorado Rapids vs San Diego — Head-to-Head

This is the first meeting Bawler has on record between Colorado Rapids and San Diego — the model's ledger starts at model launch, so no earlier fixtures between these two sides have been logged and settled yet.

The model's verdict for this fixture: Colorado Rapids 51% · draw 27% · San Diego 23%.

Model probabilities are edge estimates for entertainment — not betting advice, and past performance does not guarantee future results. 18+.

⚡ Full-time recap available
Colorado Rapids 10 San Diego FC
See how the model called it · call-by-call verdict · xG vs actual →
More match predictions ▶

Model estimates from rolling expected goals — not guaranteed outcomes. Past accuracy does not guarantee future results.