Union St.-Gilloise and Zulte-Waregem drew 0–0. Bawler's model favoured Union St.-Gilloise at 51% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave the draw 29%. It forecast 2.8 goals; nobody scored. Union St.-Gilloise had 9 shots (3 on target) to Zulte-Waregem's 11 (4), with 68% of the ball against 32%. Expected goals finished 0.9 to 1.0.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
Union St.-Gilloise and Zulte-Waregem drew 0–0. Bawler's model favoured Union St.-Gilloise at 51% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave the draw 29%. It forecast 2.8 goals; nobody scored. Union St.-Gilloise had 9 shots (3 on target) to Zulte-Waregem's 11 (4), with 68% of the ball against 32%. Expected goals finished 0.9 to 1.0.
Union St.-Gilloise 0–0 Zulte-Waregem, played on 15 Aug 2026 in the BELGIUM: Jupiler Pro League. Bawler's model had gone into it with Union St.-Gilloise 51%, the draw 29% and Zulte-Waregem 20%.
Full-time: Possession 68%–32%, Expected goals (xG) 0.9–1.0, Shots 9–11, Shots on target 3–4, Shots inside box 7–9, Big chances 1–1, Corners 9–3, Saves 4–3, Fouls 14–13, Offsides 4–0, Yellow cards 2–0.
No. It finished 0–0, so Union St.-Gilloise failed to score. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 53% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Result — we said Union St.-Gilloise 51%, it finished Draw (29% called); Total goals — we said 2.8, it finished 0; Both teams to score — we said 53%, it finished No; Model call — we said Over 1.5 Goals 83%, it finished Missed; Second call — we said Over 2.5 Goals 55%, it finished Missed.