Hull City beat Stoke City 2–1. Bawler's model favoured Stoke City at 39% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Hull City 34%. It forecast 2.8 goals and the match produced 3. Stoke City had 10 shots (4 on target) to Hull City's 18 (6), with 44% of the ball against 56%. Expected goals finished 0.9 to 1.9.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
Hull City beat Stoke City 2–1. Bawler's model favoured Stoke City at 39% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Hull City 34%. It forecast 2.8 goals and the match produced 3. Stoke City had 10 shots (4 on target) to Hull City's 18 (6), with 44% of the ball against 56%. Expected goals finished 0.9 to 1.9.
Stoke City 1–2 Hull City, played on 25 Aug 2026 in the ENGLAND: EFL Cup. Bawler's model had gone into it with Stoke City 39%, the draw 27% and Hull City 34%.
Full-time: Possession 44%–56%, Expected goals (xG) 0.9–1.9, Shots 10–18, Shots on target 4–6, Shots inside box 9–12, Big chances 2–2, Corners 1–4, Saves 5–3, Fouls 12–5, Offsides 1–2, Yellow cards 1–1.
Yes — both Stoke City and Hull City scored, finishing 1–2. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 58% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Result — we said Stoke City 39%, it finished Hull City (34% called); Total goals — we said 2.8, it finished 3; Both teams to score — we said 58%, it finished Yes; Model call — we said Over 1.5 Goals 78%, it finished Landed; Second call — we said Over 2.5 Goals 54%, it finished Landed.