How it finished
Caykur Rizespor beat Gaziantep FK 2–1. Bawler's model favoured Gaziantep FK at 39% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Caykur Rizespor 35%. It forecast 3.0 goals and the match produced 3. Gaziantep FK had 16 shots (4 on target) to Caykur Rizespor's 10 (4), with 56% of the ball against 44%. Expected goals finished 0.8 to 0.9.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
What we expected
First half — what we expected
Chance of at least one first-half goal: 76%. Based on how often each side shoots and wins corners before the break, not a share of their full-match numbers.
Model inputs
Common questions
Who won Gaziantep FK vs Caykur Rizespor?
Caykur Rizespor beat Gaziantep FK 2–1. Bawler's model favoured Gaziantep FK at 39% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Caykur Rizespor 35%. It forecast 3.0 goals and the match produced 3. Gaziantep FK had 16 shots (4 on target) to Caykur Rizespor's 10 (4), with 56% of the ball against 44%. Expected goals finished 0.8 to 0.9.
What was the final score in Gaziantep FK vs Caykur Rizespor?
Gaziantep FK 1–2 Caykur Rizespor, played on 29 Aug 2026 in the Turkey: Süper Lig. Bawler's model had gone into it with Gaziantep FK 39%, the draw 26% and Caykur Rizespor 35%.
What were the stats in Gaziantep FK vs Caykur Rizespor?
Full-time: Possession 56%–44%, Expected goals (xG) 0.8–0.9, Shots 16–10, Shots on target 4–4, Shots inside box 10–5, Big chances 1–3, Corners 8–0, Saves 2–4, Fouls 10–17, Offsides 2–2, Yellow cards 1–2.
Did both teams score in Gaziantep FK vs Caykur Rizespor?
Yes — both Gaziantep FK and Caykur Rizespor scored, finishing 1–2. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 60% before kickoff.
Was Bawler's prediction for Gaziantep FK vs Caykur Rizespor right?
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Result — we said Gaziantep FK 39%, it finished Caykur Rizespor (35% called); Total goals — we said 3.0, it finished 3; Both teams to score — we said 60%, it finished Yes; Model call — we said Over 1.5 Goals 80%, it finished Landed.