Bodo/Glimt beat NEC Nijmegen 3–1. Bawler's model favoured NEC Nijmegen at 52% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Bodo/Glimt 26%. It forecast 3.6 goals and the match produced 4. NEC Nijmegen had 22 shots (6 on target) to Bodo/Glimt's 8 (4), with 69% of the ball against 31%. On expected goals it was 2.1 to 1.6, so NEC Nijmegen created the better chances and still lost the game.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
Bodo/Glimt beat NEC Nijmegen 3–1. Bawler's model favoured NEC Nijmegen at 52% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Bodo/Glimt 26%. It forecast 3.6 goals and the match produced 4. NEC Nijmegen had 22 shots (6 on target) to Bodo/Glimt's 8 (4), with 69% of the ball against 31%. On expected goals it was 2.1 to 1.6, so NEC Nijmegen created the better chances and still lost the game.
NEC Nijmegen 1–3 Bodo/Glimt, played on 19 Aug 2026 in the EUROPE: Champions League - Qualification. Bawler's model had gone into it with NEC Nijmegen 52%, the draw 22% and Bodo/Glimt 26%.
Full-time: Possession 69%–31%, Expected goals (xG) 2.1–1.6, Shots 22–8, Shots on target 6–4, Shots inside box 12–5, Big chances 2–3, Corners 7–2, Saves 1–5, Fouls 9–12, Offsides 0–1, Yellow cards 2–1.
Yes — both NEC Nijmegen and Bodo/Glimt scored, finishing 1–3. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 68% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Result — we said NEC Nijmegen 52%, it finished Bodo/Glimt (26% called); Total goals — we said 3.6, it finished 4; Both teams to score — we said 68%, it finished Yes; Model call — we said Over 1.5 Goals 87%, it finished Landed; Second call — we said Home Win 52%, it finished Missed.