Manchester City beat Crystal Palace 4–1. Bawler's model had Manchester City in front at 38% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 2.9 goals; the match produced 5. Crystal Palace had 9 shots (1 on target) to Manchester City's 18 (9), with 28% of the ball against 72%. Expected goals finished 0.6 to 1.5.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
Chance of at least one first-half goal: 77%. Based on how often each side shoots and wins corners before the break, not a share of their full-match numbers.
Manchester City beat Crystal Palace 4–1. Bawler's model had Manchester City in front at 38% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 2.9 goals; the match produced 5. Crystal Palace had 9 shots (1 on target) to Manchester City's 18 (9), with 28% of the ball against 72%. Expected goals finished 0.6 to 1.5.
Crystal Palace 1–4 Manchester City, played on 28 Aug 2026 in the ENGLAND: Premier League. Bawler's model had gone into it with Crystal Palace 36%, the draw 26% and Manchester City 38%.
Full-time: Possession 28%–72%, Expected goals (xG) 0.6–1.5, Shots 9–18, Shots on target 1–9, Shots inside box 6–12, Big chances 2–4, Corners 2–6, Saves 4–1, Fouls 8–10, Offsides 3–0, Yellow cards 1–2.
Yes — both Crystal Palace and Manchester City scored, finishing 1–4. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 59% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Result — we said Manchester City 38%, it finished Manchester City (38% called); Total goals — we said 2.9, it finished 5; Both teams to score — we said 59%, it finished Yes; Model call — we said Over 1.5 Goals 79%, it finished Landed.