Al-Faisaly and Al Hazem drew 0–0. Bawler's model favoured Al-Faisaly at 45% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave the draw 24%. It forecast 3.4 goals; nobody scored. Al-Faisaly had 6 shots (2 on target) to Al Hazem's 13 (3), with 48% of the ball against 52%. Expected goals finished 0.8 to 1.1.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
What we expected before kickoff.
Each row is drawn on one scale, so a bar means the same length on both sides. Second-half goals are our full-match forecast minus our first half.
What we published for this match, strongest first — our three strongest above the line.
Chance of at least one goal before half-time: 83%
First-half numbers are our full-match forecast split by how much of each side's shooting and corners usually comes before the break. The small bars under each number are that side's most recent first halves (up to six).
Al-Faisaly and Al Hazem drew 0–0. Bawler's model favoured Al-Faisaly at 45% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave the draw 24%. It forecast 3.4 goals; nobody scored. Al-Faisaly had 6 shots (2 on target) to Al Hazem's 13 (3), with 48% of the ball against 52%. Expected goals finished 0.8 to 1.1.
Al-Faisaly 0–0 Al Hazem, played on 05 Sept 2026 in the Saudi Arabia: Saudi Pro League. Bawler's model had gone into it with Al-Faisaly 45%, the draw 24% and Al Hazem 31%.
Full-time: Possession 48%–52%, Expected goals (xG) 0.8–1.1, Shots 6–13, Shots on target 2–3, Shots inside box 4–6, Big chances 2–2, Corners 3–7, Saves 3–2, Fouls 10–21, Offsides 2–2, Yellow cards 2–5.
No. It finished 0–0, so Al-Faisaly failed to score. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 66% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Our call — we said Al-Faisaly or draw 69%, it finished Draw (24% called); Total goals — we said 3.4, it finished 0; Both teams to score — we said 66%, it finished No; Graded pick — we said Over 1.5 goals 85%, it finished Missed.