Colorado Rapids beat LAFC 1–0. Bawler's model favoured LAFC at 41% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Colorado Rapids 32%. It forecast 2.8 goals; only 1 was scored. Colorado Rapids had 13 shots (4 on target) to LAFC's 10 (2), with 51% of the ball against 49%.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
What we expected before kickoff.
Each row is drawn on one scale, so a bar means the same length on both sides. Shots and corners are not shown for this fixture — we do not have enough counted matches for these sides yet.
What we published for this match, strongest first — our three strongest above the line.
No first-half forecast for this fixture.
Colorado Rapids beat LAFC 1–0. Bawler's model favoured LAFC at 41% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Colorado Rapids 32%. It forecast 2.8 goals; only 1 was scored. Colorado Rapids had 13 shots (4 on target) to LAFC's 10 (2), with 51% of the ball against 49%.
Colorado Rapids 1–0 LAFC, played on 20 Aug 2026 in the USA: MLS. Bawler's model had gone into it with Colorado Rapids 32%, the draw 27% and LAFC 41%.
Full-time: Possession 51%–49%, Shots 13–10, Shots on target 4–2, Corners 4–4, Saves 2–5, Fouls 13–10, Offsides 1–3, Yellow cards 3–3.
No. It finished 1–0, so LAFC failed to score. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 57% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Our call — we said LAFC or draw 68%, it finished Colorado Rapids won (32% called); Total goals — we said 2.8, it finished 1; Both teams to score — we said 57%, it finished No; Graded pick — we said Over 1.5 goals 77%, it finished Missed; Second pick — we said Over 2.5 goals 54%, it finished Missed.