How it finished
Royal Charleroi SC beat Lommel SK 1–0. Bawler's model favoured Lommel SK at 40% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Royal Charleroi SC 32%. It forecast 2.5 goals; only 1 was scored. Lommel SK had 8 shots (0 on target) to Royal Charleroi SC's 23 (5), with 44% of the ball against 56%. Expected goals finished 0.3 to 1.3.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
What we expected
Model inputs
Common questions
Who won Lommel SK vs Royal Charleroi SC?
Royal Charleroi SC beat Lommel SK 1–0. Bawler's model favoured Lommel SK at 40% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Royal Charleroi SC 32%. It forecast 2.5 goals; only 1 was scored. Lommel SK had 8 shots (0 on target) to Royal Charleroi SC's 23 (5), with 44% of the ball against 56%. Expected goals finished 0.3 to 1.3.
What was the final score in Lommel SK vs Royal Charleroi SC?
Lommel SK 0–1 Royal Charleroi SC, played on 16 Aug 2026 in the BELGIUM: Jupiler Pro League. Bawler's model had gone into it with Lommel SK 40%, the draw 28% and Royal Charleroi SC 32%.
What were the stats in Lommel SK vs Royal Charleroi SC?
Full-time: Possession 44%–56%, Expected goals (xG) 0.3–1.3, Shots 8–23, Shots on target 0–5, Shots inside box 4–14, Big chances 0–2, Corners 2–12, Saves 3–0, Fouls 8–7, Offsides 0–1, Yellow cards 1–0.
Did both teams score in Lommel SK vs Royal Charleroi SC?
No. It finished 0–1, so Lommel SK failed to score. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 50% before kickoff.
Was Bawler's prediction for Lommel SK vs Royal Charleroi SC right?
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Result — we said Lommel SK 40%, it finished Royal Charleroi SC (32% called); Total goals — we said 2.5, it finished 1; Both teams to score — we said 50%, it finished No; Model call — we said Lommel SK or Draw 68%, it finished Missed; Second call — we said Over 2.5 Goals 52%, it finished Missed.