Union St.-Gilloise beat KVC Westerlo 5–1. Bawler's model favoured KVC Westerlo at 36% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Union St.-Gilloise 33%. It forecast 2.8 goals; the match produced 6. KVC Westerlo had 12 shots (3 on target) to Union St.-Gilloise's 19 (10), with 55% of the ball against 45%. Expected goals finished 0.8 to 1.8.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
Union St.-Gilloise beat KVC Westerlo 5–1. Bawler's model favoured KVC Westerlo at 36% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Union St.-Gilloise 33%. It forecast 2.8 goals; the match produced 6. KVC Westerlo had 12 shots (3 on target) to Union St.-Gilloise's 19 (10), with 55% of the ball against 45%. Expected goals finished 0.8 to 1.8.
KVC Westerlo 1–5 Union St.-Gilloise, played on 08 Aug 2026 in the BELGIUM: Jupiler Pro League. Bawler's model had gone into it with KVC Westerlo 36%, the draw 31% and Union St.-Gilloise 33%.
Full-time: Possession 55%–45%, Expected goals (xG) 0.8–1.8, Shots 12–19, Shots on target 3–10, Shots inside box 8–15, Big chances 0–4, Corners 4–5, Saves 4–2, Fouls 12–8, Offsides 0–4, Yellow cards 1–2.
Yes — both KVC Westerlo and Union St.-Gilloise scored, finishing 1–5. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 56% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Result — we said KVC Westerlo 36%, it finished Union St.-Gilloise (33% called); Total goals — we said 2.8, it finished 6; Both teams to score — we said 56%, it finished Yes; Model call — we said Over 1.5 Goals 75%, it finished Landed; Second call — we said Under 2.5 Goals 53%, it finished Missed.