How it finished
Zulte-Waregem beat Racing Genk 2–1. Bawler's model favoured Racing Genk at 35% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Zulte-Waregem 32%. It forecast 2.6 goals and the match produced 3. Zulte-Waregem had 11 shots (5 on target) to Racing Genk's 10 (3), with 38% of the ball against 62%. On expected goals it was 0.5 to 0.6, so Racing Genk created the better chances and still lost the game.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
What we expected
Model inputs
Common questions
Who won Zulte-Waregem vs Racing Genk?
Zulte-Waregem beat Racing Genk 2–1. Bawler's model favoured Racing Genk at 35% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Zulte-Waregem 32%. It forecast 2.6 goals and the match produced 3. Zulte-Waregem had 11 shots (5 on target) to Racing Genk's 10 (3), with 38% of the ball against 62%. On expected goals it was 0.5 to 0.6, so Racing Genk created the better chances and still lost the game.
What was the final score in Zulte-Waregem vs Racing Genk?
Zulte-Waregem 2–1 Racing Genk, played on 09 Aug 2026 in the BELGIUM: Jupiler Pro League. Bawler's model had gone into it with Zulte-Waregem 32%, the draw 33% and Racing Genk 35%.
What were the stats in Zulte-Waregem vs Racing Genk?
Full-time: Possession 38%–62%, Expected goals (xG) 0.5–0.6, Shots 11–10, Shots on target 5–3, Shots inside box 5–8, Big chances 0–2, Corners 6–3, Saves 2–3, Fouls 13–16, Offsides 0–2, Yellow cards 1–4.
Did both teams score in Zulte-Waregem vs Racing Genk?
Yes — both Zulte-Waregem and Racing Genk scored, finishing 2–1. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 52% before kickoff.
Was Bawler's prediction for Zulte-Waregem vs Racing Genk right?
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Result — we said Racing Genk 35%, it finished Zulte-Waregem (32% called); Total goals — we said 2.6, it finished 3; Both teams to score — we said 52%, it finished Yes; Model call — we said Over 1.5 Goals 69%, it finished Landed; Second call — we said Under 2.5 Goals 53%, it finished Missed.