Match prediction·Europe: Europa League - Qualification·Thursday 06 Aug, 19:00 UTC

Benfica vs Heart of Midlothian

Bawler weighs each team's recent scoring and defending, then adjusts for home advantage and injuries to work out how this match is likely to go. This page shows the full chain — every number we used.

Why the model calls it this way

Under 2.5 Goals is the play at 85% — Benfica's 0.80 xG and Hearts' 0.59 combine to just 1.39 total, signaling a low-volume Europa League qualifier.

📊 Win probability
57.6% home26.8% draw15.6% away
📈 xG chain — base → adjustments → final goal estimate
BenficastepHeart of Midlothian
1.70Base xG · rolling 26-match0.98
× 1.13Home advantage · Home× 0.94
no injury adjustment — full squads available per FotMob
1.93Final goal estimate — what the model uses0.93

Benfica average 7.1 corners per game at home this season (25 competitive matches). Hearts average 5.6 corners per game away from home this season (21 competitive matches).

🎯 Scoreline distribution · chance of each scoremodel estimate
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
6
5
2
1
1
11
10
5
1
2
11
10
5
1
3
7
6
3
1
4
3
3
1
5
1
1
1
6
home windrawaway win
Most likely outcomes
Over 1.5 goals
77%
Both teams to score
52%
Over 3.5 goals
23%

Model probabilities for this fixture, ordered by likelihood. Estimates from rolling expected goals — not guarantees.

More predictions for these teams

Benfica vs Hearts — Head-to-Head

This is the first meeting Bawler has on record between Benfica and Hearts — the model's ledger starts at model launch, so no earlier fixtures between these two sides have been logged and settled yet.

The model's verdict for this fixture: Benfica 58% · draw 27% · Hearts 16%.

Model probabilities are edge estimates for entertainment — not betting advice, and past performance does not guarantee future results. 18+.

⚡ Full-time recap available
Benfica 61 Heart of Midlothian
See how the model called it · call-by-call verdict · xG vs actual →
More match predictions ▶

Model estimates from rolling expected goals — not guaranteed outcomes. Past accuracy does not guarantee future results.