Charlton Athletic beat Cheltenham Town 3–1. Bawler's model favoured Cheltenham Town at 40% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Charlton Athletic 32%. It forecast 2.5 goals; the match produced 4. Cheltenham Town had 7 shots (2 on target) to Charlton Athletic's 17 (9), with 46% of the ball against 54%. Expected goals finished 0.9 to 1.0.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
Charlton Athletic beat Cheltenham Town 3–1. Bawler's model favoured Cheltenham Town at 40% before kickoff and got it wrong — it gave Charlton Athletic 32%. It forecast 2.5 goals; the match produced 4. Cheltenham Town had 7 shots (2 on target) to Charlton Athletic's 17 (9), with 46% of the ball against 54%. Expected goals finished 0.9 to 1.0.
Cheltenham Town 1–3 Charlton Athletic, played on 08 Aug 2026 in the ENGLAND: EFL Cup. Bawler's model had gone into it with Cheltenham Town 40%, the draw 28% and Charlton Athletic 32%.
Full-time: Possession 46%–54%, Expected goals (xG) 0.9–1.0, Shots 7–17, Shots on target 2–9, Shots inside box 4–12, Big chances 1–2, Corners 2–3, Saves 6–1, Fouls 11–8, Offsides 2–2, Yellow cards 1–0.
Yes — both Cheltenham Town and Charlton Athletic scored, finishing 1–3. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 50% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Result — we said Cheltenham Town 40%, it finished Charlton Athletic (32% called); Total goals — we said 2.5, it finished 4; Both teams to score — we said 50%, it finished Yes; Model call — we said Cheltenham Town or Draw 68%, it finished Missed; Second call — we said Over 2.5 Goals 52%, it finished Landed.