Fleetwood Town beat Chesterfield 1–0. Bawler's model had Fleetwood Town in front at 40% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 2.5 goals; only 1 was scored. Fleetwood Town had 5 shots (2 on target) to Chesterfield's 15 (1), with 29% of the ball against 71%. On expected goals it was 0.6 to 1.1, so Chesterfield created the better chances and still lost the game.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
Fleetwood Town beat Chesterfield 1–0. Bawler's model had Fleetwood Town in front at 40% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 2.5 goals; only 1 was scored. Fleetwood Town had 5 shots (2 on target) to Chesterfield's 15 (1), with 29% of the ball against 71%. On expected goals it was 0.6 to 1.1, so Chesterfield created the better chances and still lost the game.
Fleetwood Town 1–0 Chesterfield, played on 08 Aug 2026 in the ENGLAND: EFL Cup. Bawler's model had gone into it with Fleetwood Town 40%, the draw 28% and Chesterfield 32%.
Full-time: Possession 29%–71%, Expected goals (xG) 0.6–1.1, Shots 5–15, Shots on target 2–1, Shots inside box 3–10, Big chances 1–2, Corners 7–9, Saves 1–1, Fouls 21–8, Offsides 0–2, Yellow cards 3–2.
No. It finished 1–0, so Chesterfield failed to score. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 50% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Result — we said Fleetwood Town 40%, it finished Fleetwood Town (40% called); Total goals — we said 2.5, it finished 1; Both teams to score — we said 50%, it finished No; Model call — we said Fleetwood Town or Draw 68%, it finished Landed; Second call — we said Over 2.5 Goals 52%, it finished Missed.