How it finished
Malta beat Liechtenstein 2–0. Bawler's model had Malta in front at 80% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 3.4 goals; only 2 were scored. Malta had 14 shots (5 on target) to Liechtenstein's 5 (0), with 64% of the ball against 36%.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
What we said the chances were
What we expected from each side
The grey number is their average over the last six.
Shots and corners are not shown for this match — one of these national teams has too few recorded games for us to forecast them. Each bar is split by each side's share of the total.
First half — what we expected
Shots and corners are not shown for international matches yet — national teams play too few games for us to forecast them well.
Head to head
Common questions
Who won Malta vs Liechtenstein?
Malta beat Liechtenstein 2–0. Bawler's model had Malta in front at 80% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 3.4 goals; only 2 were scored. Malta had 14 shots (5 on target) to Liechtenstein's 5 (0), with 64% of the ball against 36%.
What was the final score in Malta vs Liechtenstein?
Malta 2–0 Liechtenstein, played on 27 Sept 2026 in the World: International Friendly. Bawler's model had gone into it with Malta 80%, the draw 14% and Liechtenstein 6%.
What were the stats in Malta vs Liechtenstein?
Full-time: Possession 64%–36%, Shots 14–5, Shots on target 5–0, Corners 5–2, Fouls 12–16, Offsides 0–1, Yellow cards 0–2.
Did both teams score in Malta vs Liechtenstein?
No. It finished 2–0, so Liechtenstein failed to score. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 46% before kickoff.
Was Bawler's prediction for Malta vs Liechtenstein right?
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Our call — we said Malta to win 80%, it finished Malta won (80% called); Total goals — we said 3.4, it finished 2; Both teams to score — we said 46%, it finished No.