GVVV beat Noordwijk 3–0. Bawler's model had GVVV in front at 43% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 2.9 goals and the match produced 3. GVVV had 15 shots (6 on target) to Noordwijk's 8 (1), with 43% of the ball against 57%. Expected goals finished 2.9 to 0.5.
Published before kickoff and settled afterwards — misses included. Every call is time-stamped to the Bitcoin blockchain before the match so it cannot be edited later.
The grey number is their average over the last six.
Shots and corners are not shown for this fixture — we do not have enough counted matches for these sides yet. Each bar is split by each side's share of the total.
Shots and corners are not shown for this fixture — we do not have enough counted matches for these sides yet.
GVVV beat Noordwijk 3–0. Bawler's model had GVVV in front at 43% before kickoff, and that is how it finished. It forecast 2.9 goals and the match produced 3. GVVV had 15 shots (6 on target) to Noordwijk's 8 (1), with 43% of the ball against 57%. Expected goals finished 2.9 to 0.5.
GVVV 3–0 Noordwijk, played on 29 Oct 2026 in the Netherlands: KNVB Beker. Bawler's model had gone into it with GVVV 43%, the draw 26% and Noordwijk 30%.
Full-time: Possession 43%–57%, Expected goals (xG) 2.9–0.5, Shots 15–8, Shots on target 6–1, Shots inside box 10–3, Big chances 3–1, Corners 5–4, Saves 1–2, Fouls 13–12, Offsides 7–3, Yellow cards 0–1.
No. It finished 3–0, so Noordwijk failed to score. Bawler's model had put both teams scoring at 57% before kickoff.
Every call is published before kickoff and graded afterwards, misses included. On this match: Our call — we said GVVV or draw 70%, it finished GVVV won (43% called); Total goals — we said 2.9, it finished 3; Both teams to score — we said 57%, it finished No; Graded pick — we said Over 1.5 goals 78%, it finished Landed; Second pick — we said Over 2.5 goals 55%, it finished Landed.