Bernd Leno — FPL stats
Fulham · goalkeeper · £5.0m · owned by 2.3% of managers
What Leno's numbers actually say
38 starts in 38 gameweeks, and 38 of his 38 appearances lasted an hour or more. 3,420 minutes last season. Minutes are the first thing a projection is built on, and his are not in question.
9 clean sheets and 98 saves last season — 2.6 saves a game. His team were expected to concede about 1.39 a game. Keepers score two ways and they pull against each other: a good defence means clean sheets and few save points, a bad one means the reverse.
31 points over the final six gameweeks — 5.2 a week against 3.2 across the whole season. Six gameweeks is a short run and it can flatter anyone, but he ended on the right side of it.
Against the other goalkeepers
Ranked among the goalkeepers with enough football behind them to compare fairly — the same 900-minute bar that decides who gets a page here.
Gameweek by gameweek
122 points across 38 gameweeks: 1 score of ten or more, 0 weeks with a goal or an assist, and 18 weeks of two points or fewer. His best was 10 points away at BRE in gameweek 33.
One bar per gameweek. Green is a ten-plus haul, purple is a six-plus return, grey is a quiet week.
| GW | Opponent | Mins | Pts | G | A | xG | xA | CS | Conc | Saves | Bonus | BPS | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHA (A) | 90 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 3 | · | 15 | £5.0m |
| 2 | MUN (H) | 90 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 3 | · | 13 | £5.0m |
| 3 | CHE (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | · | · | · | 2 | 4 | · | 12 | £5.0m |
| 4 | LEE (H) | 90 | 8 | · | · | · | · | 1 | · | 3 | 1 | 28 | £5.0m |
| 5 | BRE (H) | 90 | 1 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 2 | · | 9 | £5.0m |
| 6 | AVL (A) | 90 | 1 | · | · | · | · | · | 3 | 1 | · | · | £5.0m |
| 7 | BOU (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | · | · | · | 3 | 3 | · | 4 | £5.0m |
| 8 | ARS (H) | 90 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 4 | · | 19 | £5.0m |
| 9 | NEW (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | · | · | · | 2 | 5 | · | 13 | £5.0m |
| 10 | WOL (H) | 90 | 7 | · | · | · | · | 1 | · | 2 | 1 | 28 | £5.0m |
| 11 | EVE (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | · | · | · | 2 | 3 | · | 8 | £5.0m |
| 12 | SUN (H) | 90 | 5 | · | · | · | · | 1 | · | 2 | · | 25 | £5.0m |
| 13 | TOT (A) | 90 | 1 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | · | · | 2 | £5.0m |
| 14 | MCI (H) | 90 | 0 | · | · | · | · | · | 5 | · | · | -12 | £4.9m |
| 15 | CRY (H) | 90 | 2 | · | · | · | · | · | 2 | 3 | · | 8 | £4.9m |
| 16 | BUR (A) | 90 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | 2 | 6 | · | 20 | £4.9m |
| 17 | NFO (H) | 90 | 7 | · | · | · | · | 1 | · | 2 | 1 | 27 | £4.9m |
| 18 | WHU (A) | 90 | 6 | · | · | · | · | 1 | · | 2 | · | 27 | £4.9m |
| 19 | CRY (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 1 | · | 12 | £4.9m |
| 20 | LIV (H) | 90 | 1 | · | · | · | · | · | 2 | · | · | 2 | £4.9m |
| 21 | CHE (H) | 90 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 4 | · | 19 | £4.9m |
| 22 | LEE (A) | 90 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 4 | · | 19 | £4.9m |
| 23 | BHA (H) | 90 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 3 | · | 18 | £4.9m |
| 24 | MUN (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | · | · | · | 3 | 3 | · | 13 | £4.9m |
| 25 | EVE (H) | 90 | -1 | · | · | · | · | · | 2 | 2 | · | 5 | £4.9m |
| 26 | MCI (A) | 90 | 1 | · | · | · | · | · | 3 | 2 | · | 4 | £4.9m |
| 27 | SUN (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 1 | · | 6 | £4.9m |
| 28 | TOT (H) | 90 | 2 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | · | · | 4 | £4.9m |
| 29 | WHU (H) | 90 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 3 | · | 11 | £4.9m |
| 30 | NFO (A) | 90 | 7 | · | · | · | · | 1 | · | 2 | 1 | 29 | £4.9m |
| 31 | BUR (H) | 90 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 4 | · | 20 | £4.9m |
| 32 | LIV (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | · | · | · | 2 | 3 | · | 13 | £4.9m |
| 33 | BRE (A) | 90 | 10 | · | · | · | · | 1 | · | 4 | 3 | 34 | £4.9m |
| 34 | AVL (H) | 90 | 7 | · | · | · | · | 1 | · | 1 | 1 | 28 | £4.9m |
| 35 | ARS (A) | 90 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | 3 | 6 | · | 12 | £4.9m |
| 36 | BOU (H) | 90 | 3 | · | · | · | 0.01 | · | 1 | 3 | · | 18 | £4.9m |
| 37 | WOL (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 2 | · | 15 | £5.0m |
| 38 | NEW (H) | 90 | 6 | · | · | · | 0.01 | 1 | · | 2 | · | 28 | £5.0m |
Home and away
No meaningful home-or-away effect — he scored at much the same rate in both.
The fixtures ahead
Coloured by official FPL fixture difficulty — green is kind, red is not. The full grid for every club is on fixture difficulty.
What Bawler projects
The projection prices every way a goalkeeper scores — appearing, goals, assists, clean sheets, saves, defensive contribution, bonus and cards — from his minutes and his underlying numbers. Before the season starts it is fixture-neutral: what he would be worth in an average gameweek, not against a particular opponent. How the model performed across a full season, gameweek by gameweek, is published on predicted points.
Price
He started 2025/26 at £5.0m, peaked at £5.0m and finished at £5.0m — flat across the season. FPL prices follow transfers in and out, so this is a record of what the game as a whole made of him. Tonight's risers and fallers are on price changes.
Also at Fulham
Every figure on this page is computed from the Official FPL API's per-gameweek histories for Leno — the same rows the game scores — and the totals are checked against FPL's own published season aggregates on every build. Expected goals, expected assists and expected goals conceded are FPL's published values. The full sortable database is on player stats.
FPL is a free fantasy game — this is points analytics, not betting advice.
Updated 13 August 2026, 15:45 UK · Source: Official FPL API