Antoine Semenyo — FPL stats
Man City · midfielder · £8.0m · owned by 46.2% of managers
What Semenyo's numbers actually say
He scored 17 goals from chances worth about 11.1 last season — 5.9 more than the chances were worth. Some players really do finish better than average, but a gap that size usually shrinks. Treat the goals as the ceiling of what he does, not the floor.
He got 6 assists from chances he created worth about 3.1 last season. An assist needs somebody else to score, so a gap that size is usually about who was on the end of it rather than anything he changed.
37 starts in 38 gameweeks, and 35 of his 37 appearances lasted an hour or more. 3,200 minutes last season. Minutes are the first thing a projection is built on, and his are not in question.
He started at £7.0m and finished at £8.0m. Price moves follow how many managers were buying him, so this is really a record of what the game thought of him as the season went on.
Against the other midfielders
Ranked among the midfielders with enough football behind them to compare fairly — the same 900-minute bar that decides who gets a page here.
Gameweek by gameweek
202 points across 38 gameweeks: 5 scores of ten or more, 18 weeks with a goal or an assist, and 12 weeks of two points or fewer. His best was 18 points at home to FUL in gameweek 7.
One bar per gameweek. Green is a ten-plus haul, purple is a six-plus return, grey is a quiet week.
| GW | Opponent | Mins | Pts | G | A | xG | xA | Bonus | BPS | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LIV (A) | 90 | 15 | 2 | · | 0.91 | 0.02 | 3 | 42 | £7.0m |
| 2 | WOL (H) | 90 | 6 | · | 1 | 0.68 | 0.07 | · | 11 | £7.1m |
| 3 | TOT (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | 0.21 | 0.06 | · | 4 | £7.3m |
| 4 | BHA (H) | 90 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0.87 | 0.06 | 3 | 39 | £7.4m |
| 5 | NEW (H) | 90 | 5 | · | · | 0.11 | 0.05 | · | 9 | £7.6m |
| 6 | LEE (A) | 90 | 7 | 1 | · | 0.21 | 0.05 | · | 22 | £7.7m |
| 7 | FUL (H) | 90 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0.66 | 0.06 | 3 | 63 | £7.8m |
| 8 | CRY (A) | 90 | 4 | · | 1 | 0.13 | 0.03 | · | 7 | £8.0m |
| 9 | NFO (H) | 90 | 3 | · | · | 0.03 | 0.04 | · | 14 | £8.1m |
| 10 | MCI (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | 0.03 | 0.02 | · | 6 | £8.1m |
| 11 | AVL (A) | 90 | 0 | · | · | 0.79 | · | · | -3 | £8.1m |
| 12 | WHU (H) | 0 | 0 | · | · | · | · | · | · | £8.0m |
| 13 | SUN (A) | 90 | 1 | · | · | 0.10 | 0.50 | · | 6 | £7.9m |
| 14 | EVE (H) | 90 | 4 | · | · | 0.26 | 0.15 | · | 17 | £7.8m |
| 15 | CHE (H) | 90 | 3 | · | · | 0.18 | 0.13 | · | 14 | £7.7m |
| 16 | MUN (A) | 90 | 6 | 1 | · | 0.13 | 0.04 | · | 27 | £7.6m |
| 17 | BUR (H) | 90 | 10 | 1 | · | 0.11 | 0.43 | 3 | 38 | £7.6m |
| 18 | BRE (A) | 90 | 9 | 1 | · | 0.75 | 0.08 | 2 | 38 | £7.7m |
| 19 | CHE (A) | 90 | 5 | · | 1 | 0.28 | 0.01 | · | 7 | £7.7m |
| 20 | ARS (H) | 90 | 1 | · | · | 0.09 | 0.02 | · | 6 | £7.7m |
| 21 | TOT (H) | 90 | 6 | 1 | · | 0.16 | 0.01 | · | 23 | £7.6m |
| 22 | MUN (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | 0.05 | 0.15 | · | 15 | £7.6m |
| 23 | WOL (H) | 90 | 8 | 1 | · | 0.30 | 0.02 | · | 24 | £7.7m |
| 24 | TOT (A) | 90 | 7 | 1 | · | 0.64 | 0.02 | · | 21 | £7.8m |
| 25 | LIV (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | 0.17 | 0.01 | · | 4 | £7.8m |
| 26 | FUL (H) | 90 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0.55 | 0.17 | 3 | 36 | £7.9m |
| 27 | NEW (H) | 86 | 4 | · | · | 0.32 | 0.07 | · | 13 | £8.0m |
| 28 | LEE (A) | 90 | 8 | 1 | · | 0.86 | 0.02 | · | 31 | £8.1m |
| 29 | NFO (H) | 90 | 7 | 1 | · | 0.23 | 0.02 | · | 28 | £8.2m |
| 30 | WHU (A) | 74 | 2 | · | · | 0.12 | 0.02 | · | 7 | £8.3m |
| 32 | CHE (A) | 90 | 2 | · | · | 0.29 | 0.03 | · | 13 | £8.2m |
| 33 | ARS (H) | 90 | 2 | · | · | 0.05 | 0.04 | · | 6 | £8.2m |
| 33 | BUR (A) | 64 | 3 | · | · | 0.27 | 0.27 | · | 14 | £8.2m |
| 35 | EVE (A) | 74 | 2 | · | · | 0.12 | 0.07 | · | 8 | £8.2m |
| 36 | BRE (H) | 90 | 3 | · | · | 0.08 | 0.17 | · | 19 | £8.1m |
| 36 | CRY (H) | 90 | 9 | 1 | · | 0.23 | 0.08 | 1 | 26 | £8.1m |
| 37 | BOU (A) | 55 | 1 | · | · | 0.03 | 0.06 | · | 5 | £8.1m |
| 38 | AVL (H) | 57 | 6 | 1 | · | 0.10 | 0.07 | · | 18 | £8.0m |
Home and away
A real gap — he was worth about 2.6 points a game more at home. Worth a thought when his run of fixtures is lopsided, but nineteen games either way is still a small sample.
The fixtures ahead
Coloured by official FPL fixture difficulty — green is kind, red is not. The full grid for every club is on fixture difficulty.
What Bawler projects
The projection prices every way a midfielder scores — appearing, goals, assists, clean sheets, saves, defensive contribution, bonus and cards — from his minutes and his underlying numbers. Before the season starts it is fixture-neutral: what he would be worth in an average gameweek, not against a particular opponent. How the model performed across a full season, gameweek by gameweek, is published on predicted points.
Price
He started 2025/26 at £7.0m, peaked at £8.3m and finished at £8.0m — a move of +1.0m. FPL prices follow transfers in and out, so this is a record of what the game as a whole made of him. Tonight's risers and fallers are on price changes.
Also at Man City
Every figure on this page is computed from the Official FPL API's per-gameweek histories for Semenyo — the same rows the game scores — and the totals are checked against FPL's own published season aggregates on every build. Expected goals, expected assists and expected goals conceded are FPL's published values. The full sortable database is on player stats.
FPL is a free fantasy game — this is points analytics, not betting advice.
Updated 13 August 2026, 15:45 UK · Source: Official FPL API